![]() | |||||||||
| |||||||||
|
Food Fishing Issue
Left: Sonja from Germany, with the first salmon she
had ever caught.
These kayakers were exploring the waters surrounding the ancient Haida village of SGang Gwaii, on the Queen Charlotte Islands, during a guided 8-day wilderness kayak tour. Sustainable hook & line food fishing was recently prohibited in the area.
Several high-intensity commercial fishing methods remain permitted in the area. Contents
Who
are GHTOA
members provide the primary source of access to all Gwaii Haanas visitors.
Links to members, as well as our
association's purpose and history,
are all available online.
What?s
the issue? Correspondence has been exchanged with the Canadian Government on this
issue; copies are available online. Proposed
solutions are included below.
How
did this occur? To
qualify for a license, each tour operator must meet strict and costly
requirements, as well as ensure their business operates within an established
quota allocation. (Business
licenses include quota, which is the maximum number of visitors each tour
operator is permitted to take into Gwaii Haanas.) Both
the GHTOA and the AMB were unaware that the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
was considering Rockfish Conservation Areas. Ironically, in anticipation of the proposed National Marine Conservation Area
Reserve, tour operators and the AMB were exchanging correspondence on the topic of
prospective fishing regulations. During this exchange, the Canadian Government assured us that
"any
decision on closures will be made in consultation with residents and stakeholders,
including tour operators." Today,
fishing closures have been implemented, yet no GHTOA consultation ever
occurred. A crucial and significant
gap exists in the Rockfish Conservation Area consultation process and, as a result, a large RCA
was established in the heart of the most essential tourism region in Gwaii
Haanas.
Why
is this a problem? Rockfish
Conservation Areas were implemented on April 1, 2004. Incredibly, it was over six months later when Parks Canada first
became aware of the RCAs. Parks
Canada then immediately notified tour operators of the fishing closures.
To GHTOA members? dismay, our initial notice of the closures occurred
only after a full season of unknowingly fishing illegally within the recently
established RCAs. Clearly,
serious flaws exist in the communications surrounding the consultation,
implementation and notification of the RCAs. The
recently established RCA 59 extends for kilometres around Anthony Island,
where the ancient Haida Indian village of SGang Gwaay (aka Ninstints)
exists. In 1981, the United
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) designated
the abandoned Haida village of SGang Gwaay as a World Heritage Site.
The historical village is unique; it?s totem poles and World Heritage
designation attracts travellers from around the globe. Extreme weather conditions, remoteness and AMB regulations combine to make this region nearly uninhabited and clearly uncrowded. A controlled number of dedicated visitors manage to reach the area during the short summer months. Sustainable food fishing is an integral part of the Gwaii Haanas experience. Tour operators and their clients are negatively impacted as a result of the ban imposed on fishing all species of rockfish and salmon. Most seriously affected are multi-day self supported wilderness sea kayak expedition companies and their clients. These small eco-tourism businesses provide week-long kayak tours completely within the area now designated as RCA 59. Participants on these human powered sea kayaking expeditions are unable travel outside of RCA 59. Fishing from a small paddle-craft allows visitors to more deeply realize our connection to the sea and more fully appreciate the rich Haida history of the area. Kayakers on self-supported wilderness experiences must be permitted to continue the respectful, sustainable practice of food fishing. The removal of our right to food fish is an extremely serious blow to the quality of experience we are able to provide to our clients. Furthermore, tour companies are experiencing significant negative marketing impacts, since we are now prohibited from offering the quintessential Canadian experience of catching a fish from a small vessel to be enjoyed fresh for the evening meal. In perhaps its purist form, a sea kayaking guest can no longer have the unique experience of catching a fish from a kayak, bringing it ashore and cooking it over a campfire. The
actual number of fish caught by Gwaii Haanas tour visitors during the summer
months is insignificant when compared to the vast quantities harvested
year-round by commercial fishing fleets. Commercial
fishing methods permitted in RCAs include:
These high-intensity commercial fishing methods result in considerable "by-catch" of rockfish and other non-targeted species. When considering all the different methods of commercial fishing permitted within Rockfish Conservation Areas, it's highly probable that the year-round commercial rockfish by-catch will consistently far outweigh the few fish tour clients may catch during the short summer season. Commercial by-catch is typically pushed back into the sea, dead or mortally wounded. Food fishers keep what they catch and take only enough for the next meal. RCA
regulations permit commercial and First Nations vessels to harvest
thousands of kilograms of fish, while a food fisher is denied the right to
drop a hook in hopes of catching a single fish for dinner. Results
of the DFOs 2000 Recreational Fishing Survey of Canada indicate; "The
recreational fishery provides significant economic benefits for Canada.
Despite a drop in activity, sport fishing remains one of the most
popular pastimes for Canadians and visitors alike, and one of the best
ways of increasing awareness of the benefits of protecting and enhancing
our natural resources for future generations."
Proposed
solutions:
With a new National Marine Conservation Area Reserve proposed for this region, we hope the Canadian Government will take the opportunity to resolve the negative eco-tourism impacts resulting from the regulations recently implemented by DFO. We
seek to motivate our government to consider these proposals and to implement
an appropriate and effective solution.
Solution
#1 Perhaps
the simplest solution would be to shift the boundary of RCA #59 so that it
extends further north and further south from the region it now encompasses.
The shift would re-open hook-and-line fishing in the core of the vital
tourism region surrounding the Haida village of SGang Gwaay. The
boundary shift would provide protection for additional high-density rockfish habitat and would
also involve the
area recommended for protection by Parks Canada.
The map below shows an outline of the vital
tourism region that we propose to re-open to hook-and-line food fishing.
The map also indicates additional rockfish habitat where RCAs would not
destroy tourism opportunities.
Solution
#2 Food-fishers
across Canada are ineffectively governed by regulations that are primarily
designed for sport-fishers. Food
fishing and sport fishing are distinctly different; particularly when
food-fishers operate from human-powered vessels during wilderness expeditions
while catching only enough fish for dinner. Numerous
sport fishing lodges exist on the northern regions of the Queen Charlotte
Islands. It is certainly not our
goal to adversely affect their ability to offer fishing experiences to their
clients. (We imagine that lodge
owners and staff are thankful that extensive RCAs were not implemented in the
heart of their operating area.) However,
regulations designed to govern the mechanized sport-trophy fishing industry do
not apply practically to the occasional
effort to catch a fish for immediate consumption by a participant on a
weeklong eco-tourism trip.
These two distinct fishing classifications merit serious consideration,
especially when taking into account the numerous different commercial fishing
classifications regulated by the DFO. Under
new food-fishing regulations, fishers could be permitted to harvest a small
and sustainable quantity of fish for the purpose of eating immediately.
New food-fishing regulations could also prohibit the harmful practice
of continually catching and releasing fish until enough trophy-sized specimens
are obtained. (Many released fish
do not survive the incident.) There?s
no doubt that new food-fishing regulations would require public education, yet this could be considered a forward-thinking direction for
the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to adopt. Additional
Solutions Additional solutions are located online: www.placeofwonder.com/fishing-solutions.rhtml If
the DFO does not view the above-proposed solutions favourably, we are
willing to work in cooperation with DFO staff to find alternative solutions to
this critical issue.
|
||||||||